When it comes to special needs, there are two distinct camps: those
who wish to segregate in self-contained classrooms of similar students
and those who promote inclusion.
As a child I can recall
the "Resource Room" students who hardly ever interacted with the general
student population at Ostrander Elementary School. It was hard to even
peer into their classroom, but when I did I remember seeing students
slouched in chairs or hearing loud noises. I came to view these kids
not as peers, but as students who were less capable than I and thus
unfit to spend their time in my presence. This sounds pompous, but it
was how my school environment led me to view students with special
needs. I did have two friends who went to Reading & Math lab while
the rest of the class worked together in these subjects, and I didn't
think less of their abilities since I had the opportunity to interact
with them on a social level and in other ways in the classroom.
Although
I say that I wish we'd had more inclusive classes, I hope that would
include challenging all students to their individual abilities. There
were times when I wasn't challenged enough and it could be reflected in
my achievement (I earned better grades in Honors Spanish than in the
regular class). It isn't hard for me to then imagine how if a student
is not met at his or her level they won't progress.
Patrick Schwarz1, author of "From Disability to Possibility: The
Power of Inclusive Classrooms," shares his experiences with special
needs students in a wonderfully concise and positive way. His book
provides numerous accounts of the success of inclusiveness.
Unfortunately, my own perception is that inclusiveness is best attained
when there are numerous experienced staff members with plenty of time,
legal documents, involved parents and flexible and empathetic
educators. Without these people to recognize a need, advocate for
special consideration, determine the needs of the student, brainstorm
creative plans, take the time to implement them and to effectively
assess the outcomes it is easy to understand why so many students don't
value themselves and their education.
When these people and services are present, the results can be
remarkable. Schwarz comments that, "often, meeting the learning needs
of students on either end of the learning spectrum (students with gifts
and challenges) improves the quality of education in the entire
classroom" (p. 15).
I hate the fact that there has to be legal documents to allow
students to receive special considerations. Why can't we just observe
and evaluate enough to understand that all students are going to need
different approaches to the same situation? I worry that so many
students are not presented with educational experiences in the most
empowering way possible because their teachers don't have the legal
binding or don't feel that they are responsible for providing
differentiation. Schwarz summarizes this thought by saying,
"Traditional viewpoints are outdated now that general educators deal
with much more diversity in their classrooms and special educators are
responsible for helping their teachers achieve a general education" (p.
17).
Schwarz maintains that although inclusion is not easy it is better. "True inclusion is the attitude that all students belong everywhere, with everyone else, in the school community" (p. 34).
I have spoken with many colleagues on the topic of inclusion. Most do identify with Schwarz that it is often better for the student with special needs. Nearly all of them, however, also remarked that although exposing "regular" students to diversity has its benefits having one or more students with significant special needs can adversely affect these student's experience. Then it seems to become a question of who sacrifices the most.
My colleagues, who represent various roles as educators in a variety of settings, all also identified that there isn't nearly enough experience, staff and time to truly meet the diverse needs of an inclusive classroom.
APPROACHING INSTRUCTION
Given how many different kinds of disabilities there are and that teachers who really care about their students focus on their individual needs, I feel that the least overwhelming and most helpful way to plan for educating students with special needs is to simply practice empathy and patience. I have found the following videos to be insightful. The first focuses on student's experiences with their learning disabilities. The second helps to explain various types of learning disabilities. The woman in the third describes a specific suggestion she gives to students. She gives this as an example of how a strategy for students with learning disabilities can benefit all students. Schwarz makes many mentions of this concept, and so it should be an overarching theme: instead of singling out students and making accommodations, we should instead assess their needs and work to integrate them into our general instruction.
1 Schwarz, P. (2006). From disability to possibility: The power of inclusive classrooms. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. ↩
Thanks for sharing your grappling with philosophical and logistical matters regarding the values and practices surrounding special education in the U.S. It is a bit challenging to know that in our nation there needs to be layers of legal protections put into place in order to ensure that what is merely good education or best practice will actually happen. Perhaps a historical perspective would be helpful to find out how we got here. I also appreciate the videos, but would be really interested in original videos of interviews that you might lead at your own school that could also be uploaded.
ReplyDelete